Donation Amount. Min £2

East Africa

From right, MultiChoice Kenya acting MD Nzola Miranda, finance director Ruth Omondi and legal officer Clare Ruto at Parliament Buildings in Nairobi on December 14, 2023. [Elvis Ogina, Standard]

MPs are considering the termination of a multi-million-dollar contract between MultiChoice Africa and the Kenya Broadcasting Corporation, citing it as an unfavourable agreement.

According to documents presented before Parliament, the two parties entered into a contract in 1994, allowing the national broadcaster to air international channels, while MultiChoice was responsible for providing content.

The detailed terms revealed that KBC held a 40 per cent stake in the agreement, while MultiChoice held the remaining 60 per cent. This initial agreement underwent a review in 1996.

 

As part of the contract, the national broadcaster was obligated to furnish equipment and infrastructure to facilitate Kenya's transition from analogue to digital broadcasting.

However, last week, members of the Public Investments Committee on Social Services, Administration, and Agriculture expressed concerns about the contract, saying the national broadcaster was receiving an unfair deal.

The House team, led by Navakholo MP Emmanuel Wangwe, pressed the management of MultiChoice Kenya to explain why millions owed to KBC in dividends had not been fully remitted and questioned why the national broadcaster was excluded from the day-to-day operations of the organisation.

The committee also scrutinised the company's senior executives and requested an explanation for a dividend funds variance of Sh20 million.

"As of 2011, the dividends owed to KBC amount to Sh116 million, but according to audited books, the national broadcaster received only Sh96 million. 

"Explain to this committee the glaring anomaly and clarify the purpose for diverting the funds intended for dividends," said committee vice chair Caleb Amisi.

"…based on our engagement with MultiChoice, we believe KBC is not receiving adequate value for money, and that is the reason for our presence here. We believe this agreement should be terminated unless MultiChoice considers a review to restore confidence on the part of KBC," added the vice chair.

However, MultiChoice finance director Ruth Omondi said all funds were indeed paid to KBC.

"I was not present at the time the deal was negotiated, and my responses are based on the records I have. Documents in our possession indicate that all the dividends were paid to KBC," she said.

The MPs, however, swiftly engaged in another confrontation with the firm's management, questioning why despite KBC holding a 40 per cent stake in the deal, it only had two out of five board members and lacked representation at the management level, hindering its ability to monitor day-to-day operations.

They also heard that during the actualisation of analogue to digital TV transition, KBC was to provide on-ground equipment and frequency whereas Multi-Choice was to provide content.

Multi-choice legal representative Clare Ruto defended the firm, saying the change in content had been done in agreement with KBC after certain channels proved not commercially viable.

“We were a content provider and it was KBC’s work to provide equipment. We have not moved out of the contract,” said Ruto.

The management of Multi-choice is set to appear before the committee again with key contract documents. By Josphat Thiong'o, The Standard

“Lucky are the people of Yugoslavia and Somalia as the world’s eyes rest on them … it is painful to die or be killed, without anybody knowing it” — letter from Juba, South Sudan, August 1992.

This December marks the fifth anniversary of the Sudanese revolution. It was a powerful demonstration of the people’s will, but its promise of bringing about civilian rule and peace in Sudan has yet to be realised. After ousting former president and long-time dictator Omar al-Bashir, and giving hope to the Sudanese people, two men — Gen Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Mohamed Hamden “Hemedti” Dagalo — became engaged in an ongoing violent and brutal struggle for power.

Last December, Sudan’s military and civilian authorities agreed on a political framework deal, which broke the political deadlock and provided for a transition to civilian government. Crucial to this process, however, were major security sector reforms that would mean the full integration of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) into the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF).

As is too often the case, Sudan’s latest bout of conflict has hit civilian populations hardest

Not wanting to see his power diminished, RSF commander Dagalo was reluctant, leading to tensions with SAF chief of staff al-Burhan, which escalated to armed conflict in April 2023. As of now, the promise of the Sudanese revolution seems as far from realisation as ever.

As is too often the case, Sudan’s latest bout of conflict has hit civilian populations hardest. The fighting initially centred in Khartoum, where bitter fighting and heavy aerial bombardment in populated areas has claimed the lives of hundreds of civilians. Since then, the violence has spread to other areas across the country, including the already conflict-wrecked Darfur region.

The conflict has degenerated with violations of international humanitarian law and reports of ethnically motivated killings, mass graves and rape now commonplace. All in all, more than 12,190 people have been killed since fighting broke out in mid-April, more than 5.3 million civilians have been internally displaced and some 24.7 million have needed humanitarian assistance this year.

Yet, the conflict in Sudan does not often find itself in the crosshairs of public discourse. Rather, it is a forgotten war.

Sudan’s invisibility has to do with a combination of factors. The first relates to the media and their editorial preferences. The media can be apprehensive of the difficulty involved in presenting a comprehensive account of the conflict or may be doubtful of their audience’s capacity to engage with and digest a narrative which lacks an obvious “good guy” or “bad guy”. As the conflict in Sudan is particularly complex, involving multiple armed factions and historical roots spanning decades, hesitancy on the part of the media to cover it is unsurprising.

A second factor relates simply to the passage of time and the existence of other conflicts competing for the world’s attention, which is itself ever-shortening due to changes in information consumption patterns and the prevalence of short-form media.

Since the beginning of hostilities in Sudan alone, conflict has erupted in Nagorno-Karabakh and Gaza. Chad has experienced a military coup and war continues to rage in Ukraine and the Democratic Republic of Congo. The world is at war and the conflict in Sudan is but one of many deserving of our focus.

Finally, and intimately related to the previous factor, is the strategic importance of a conflict relative to the geo-political interests of regional and great powers. Where a conflict is central to the interests of the international community, media coverage will be widespread, public interest is likely to endure and humanitarian intervention is more forthcoming, even in the face of difficulties. 

It might be wishful thinking to believe that shedding light on a conflict will lead to its resolution and an end to a people’s suffering, but it is the most crucial of first stepsDiscouraging as it is, it appears that conflict in Sudan and the struggle of its people do not feature prominently in the interests of the international community. Their eyes appear firmly fixed on Kyiv and Gaza.

The Proverb 31:8-9: “Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute” —implores Christians to acknowledge suffering in silence. But one need not be Christian to understand that the label “the forgotten war” should be a call to action for us all.

It highlights both the failure of the international community to get behind any form of resolution and the need for increased awareness, diplomatic efforts and humanitarian support to address the ongoing challenges in Sudan and prevent further suffering.

It might be wishful thinking to believe that shedding light on a conflict will lead to its resolution and an end to a people’s suffering, but it is the most crucial of first steps. Awareness is a prerequisite to action. 

Paul Westbury, based at Kigali in Rwanda, is global safety & access adviser with Goal, The Irish Times

 
 
 
Foreign Affairs CS Musalia Mudavadi. [File, Standard]

Kenya has distanced itself from claims of involvement in the internal affairs of Democratic Republic of Congo. This comes hours after DRC recalled its ambassadors from Kenya and Tanzania for consultations after a new Congolese military alliance that includes rebels was launched in the Kenyan capital.

In a statement on Sunday morning, Foreign Affairs CS Musalia Mudavadi says investigations into the allegations ongoing adding that Kenya is a country where ‘freedom of the press is vouchsafed’. 

“Kenya strongly disassociates itself from any utterances or activities likely to injure the peace and security of the friendly Nation of DRC and has commenced investigation to determine the identities of the makers of the statement and the extent to which their utterances fall outside constitutionally protected speech,” Musalia’s statement reads in part.

“The Ministry wishes to note that Kenya is an open and democratic state where freedom of the press is vouchsafed. As such, nationals and non-nationals may engage the Kenyan media without reference to the government,” 

The envoy to Tanzania was recalled because Tanzania hosts the headquarters of the East African Community, which Congo also belongs to.

Earlier on Saturday, the Kenyan embassy's head of mission had been summoned to the foreign ministry in Kinshasa. The Kenyan government could not immediately be reached for comment.

On Friday, Congolese politicians and groups including the M23 rebels, who have seized territory in eastern Congo, and Corneille Nangaa, a former Congo election commission chief, launched the Congo River Alliance in Nairobi. By Winfrey Owino, The Standard

Victims of false teeth. Photo: thenormaproject.org

The World Health Organization (WHO) on Friday announced the inclusion of noma disease in its official list of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs).

The decision was recommended by the 17th meeting of the Strategic and Technical Advisory Group for Neglected Tropical Diseases. The decision has been welcomed because it is likely to expand health services to the world's most vulnerable populations. 

Noma or cancrum oris affects the face, eating the soft tissues and often destroying the bones completely. Sometimes it destroys the nose or even the eyes. This complication has been mainly common in West Africa. No wonder the Nigerian government and some activists from Nigeria and Côte d'Ivoire among others have been campaigning to have it listed among the World’s Neglected Diseases.

Studies in countries where it is prevalent, indicate that it affects mainly children under the age of seven. Malnutrition, a lack of vaccinations, poor oral hygiene, and poverty have been listed among the many contributing factors to noma. 

WHO director-general, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said noma is more than a disease, it is a social marker of extreme poverty and malnutrition, affecting the most vulnerable populations.

By classifying noma as a neglected tropical disease, we are shining a light on a condition that has afflicted marginalized communities for centuries. We are committed to working with affected countries and communities to address the drivers of noma, and alleviate the suffering it causes,” said Ghebreyesus.

According to WHO, noma is a severe gangrenous disease of the mouth and face, that primarily affects malnourished young children (aged between 2 and 6 years) in regions of extreme poverty. It starts as an inflammation of the gums, which, if not treated early, spreads quickly to destroy facial tissues and bones.

It frequently leads to death, with survivors suffering severe disfigurement. Accurate estimation of the number of noma cases is challenging due to the rapid progression of the disease and the associated stigma, which contributes to leaving many cases undiagnosed. Cases of noma are mostly found in sub-Saharan Africa, although cases have also been reported in the Americas and Asia. In Uganda, studies have linked this complication to false teeth (ebiino/ebinyo) extraction. 

A study published in 2017 in the Journals of Case Reports said: "False teeth” (ebiino/ebinyo) refers to gingival swelling that occurs during the eruption of the primary canine teeth in infants and consists of the extraction of deciduous canine tooth buds. This practice, which is part of infant oral mutilation, is relatively common in African countries with an incidence that varies from place to place, ranging between 15 per cent and 80 per cent, especially in Angola, Tanzania, Somalia, Kenya, Sudan, Nigeria, and Uganda. 

The study further states that the practice arises from the belief that these “killer” canines cause fever, diarrhea, and any other infant illness, thus necessitating their removal, usually by traditional herbalists using unclean instruments and fingernails. 

In Bushenyi district in western Uganda, a study showed that more than one in two of the households had a child younger than 5 years old who had had false teeth in the last 5 years as of 2007, with more than 80 per cent of the respondents using traditional medicine alone or in combination with modern medicine to treat “false teeth disease.

The National Oral Health Policy developed by the ministry of Health does not however mention noma. Evidence from WHO indicates that noma is caused by bacteria found in the mouth. There are multiple risk factors associated with this disease, including poor oral hygiene, malnutrition, weakened immune systems, infections, and extreme poverty. 

Noma isn't contagious but tends to strike when the body's defenses are down. Early detection is essential, as therapy is most effective at the early stages of disease when it causes severe swollen gums, known as acute necrotizing gingivitis. Treatment involves antibiotics, advice and support on practices to improve oral hygiene with disinfectant mouthwash (salt water or chlorhexidine could be used) and nutritional supplements. 

If diagnosed during the early stages of the disease, treatment can lead to proper wound healing without long-term consequences. In severe cases though, surgery may be necessary. Children who survive the gangrenous stage of the disease are likely to suffer severe facial disfigurement, have difficulty eating and speaking, face social stigma and isolation, and need reconstructive surgery.  

The recognition of noma as an NTD aims to amplify global awareness, catalyse research, stimulate funding, and boost efforts to control the disease through multisectoral and multi-pronged approaches. Interventions addressing the burden of this devastating disease will contribute to achieving universal health coverage, as they will specifically target pockets of underserved populations.

Noma is often managed by oral health programmes in endemic areas and collaboration with NTD programmes at the operational level can be strengthened, notably by integrating noma within the activities aimed at detecting and managing skin-related neglected tropical diseases (skin NTDs).

The Government of Nigeria spearheaded action to have noma included in the list of NTDs. In January 2023, an official request was submitted to WHO on behalf of 32 member states. The request was supported by a detailed dossier highlighting the burden and distribution of noma and providing evidence to demonstrate fulfillment of the criteria set by WHO.

Several partner institutions contributed by sharing information and conducting advocacy. With noma now on the list, the total number of NTDs listed by WHO are twenty-one.  By URN/The Observer

The barrel-chested Brexiteer is back - but this week has shown he is now an irrelevance. This week marked the fourth anniversary of the catastrophic 2019 “get Brexit done” general election and whatever horrors have befallen us in the intervening years, one thing has proved rather pleasant: The silence of Mark Francois.

During the Brexit wars, the rotund MP for Rayleigh and Wickford could be relied upon to make any bad situation worse, any stupid notion even more idiotic in his role as a spokesperson for the hilariously named European Research Group (hated Europe, done no research). Few will forget – though many will have tried – how this human luncheon meat statue of Penfold from Danger Mouse clomped his way around the TV studios, burbling vaingloriously about Spartans and star chambers while dispensing gormless bons mot like “my father never submitted to bullying by any German and neither will his son” and accusing the anti-Brexit CEO of Airbus of being “a German paratrooper in his youth” (said CEO was born in 1958).

Ironically, the moment this lardy Icarus flew too close to the sun came four years ago, when the Tories won their near-landslide victory. “In 1989, the Berlin Wall came down. In 2019, the red wall came down,” gloated Francois during an election night appearance on the BBC, leaving Andrew Neil to ask “have you slightly gone mad? Are you hallucinating?” Neil knew what little Mark had yet to grasp – the size of Boris Johnson’s majority now rendered the once-influential ERG (and the DUP, and associated headbangers) impotent. There were reports that when that interview with Neil appeared on screens at Conservative HQ, Francois was jeered and heckled, including a cry of “he can say what the f*** he wants now – we don’t need the ERG any more.”

A satisfying period of silence from Francois then ensued. Until this anniversary week, when (with what must be considerable difficulty) he rose again from a well-stuffed leather armchair the same colour as his own face and inserted himself in the Rwanda debacle. Not, as you might have expected, to offer to fly asylum seekers there himself in a reconditioned Spitfire, but to wake up the sleeping ERG Spartans, star chamber and all, and have them take their place as one of the “five families” of the Tory right.

Francois has spent his life living in the past – specifically, the second world war. It must be a sign of progress that he now yearns for the days when he was almost as important as he thinks he is; that dizzy spell between the elections of 2017 and 2019.

But this is not then and Rwanda isn’t Brexit. Britain is no longer a single-issue country. The cost of living, our crumbling services and the doom-soaked economy are what concern voters most, not one small part of a wider migration policy that at best will deal (cruelly) with a couple of hundred asylum seekers. The notion that sudden success in sending a few unfortunates off to Kigali will make voters forget about 14 wasted years of Tory rule when it comes to the general election is risible. And because voters loathe division, even more Conservative psychodrama is likely to result in even more Conservative losses whenever Sunak dares to go to the country.

Even the assorted lemmings of the “five families” (TBF, Boris Johnson’s had more) recognised this, belatedly. So instead of tormenting the PM as some of them did to Theresa May, these ruthless rebels bared their teeth, sharpened their knives and promised to let Rishi Sunak do whatever he wanted, at least until everyone had enjoyed a jolly nice Christmas.  And Mark Francois was put back in his box. Please, this time let him stay there.  By STEVE ANGLESEY, The New European

About IEA Media Ltd

Informer East Africa is a UK based diaspora Newspaper. It is a unique platform connecting East Africans at home and abroad through news dissemination. It is a forum to learn together, grow together and get entertained at the same time.

To advertise events or products, get in touch by info [at] informereastafrica [dot] com or call +447957636854.
If you have an issue or a story, get in touch with the editor through editor[at] informereastafrica [dot] com or call +447886544135.

We also accept donations from our supporters. Please click on "donate". Your donations will go along way in supporting the newspaper.

Get in touch

Our Offices

London, UK
+44 7886 544135
editor (@) informereastafrica.com
Slough, UK
+44 7957 636854
info (@) informereastafrica.com

Latest News

UK hands over Chagos Islands to Mauritius in exchange for securing strategic military base

UK hands over Chagos...

Net overall cost of securing Diego Garcia military base for next 99 years is $4.5B, says Keir Starme...

End to asylum seekers in hotels ‘a fair way off’ despite latest fall

End to asylum seeker...

People believed to be migrants leaving by bus in Dover, Kent, following small boat crossings in the...

Activist Boniface Mwangi released from Tanzania

Activist Boniface Mw...

He is in high spirits. The Commission and other partners are making arrangements to transfer him to...

US-Kenya Creative Economy Forum 2025 to Boost Film, Music, and Sports Industries

US-Kenya Creative Ec...

A photo of people at a film set Photo World Atlas Kenyans in the creative industry and sports are s...

For Advertisement

Big Reach

Informer East Africa is one platform for all people. It is a platform where you find so many professionals under one umbrella serving the African communities together.

Very Flexible

We exist to inform you, hear from you and connect you with what is happening around you. We do this professionally and timely as we endeavour to capture all that you should never miss. Informer East Africa is simply news for right now and the future.

Quality News

We only bring to you news that is verified, checked and follows strict journalistic guidelines and standards. We believe in 1. Objective coverage, 2. Impartiality and 3. Fair play.

Banner & Video Ads

A banner & video advertisement from our sponsors will show up every once in a while. It keeps us and our writers coffee replenished.