Belgium has rejected Vincent Karega, Rwanda’s ambassador-designate, a development that is expected to strain diplomatic relations between Kigali and Brussels.

Mr Karega was expected to take up the post after his appointment by President Paul Kagame in March, to replace Dieudonné Sebashongore. But after four months of suspense, Belgium has rejected him, marking a turning point in the diplomatic relations between the two countries connected by a colonial history.

Yolande Makolo, Rwanda government spokesperson, termed the decision "unfortunate,” adding that the Belgian government “seems to have capitulated to pressure from the DRC government as well as propaganda from ‘negationist’ organisations and activists, through whom they decided to leak the decision."

Although Brussels is yet to publicly comment on the matter, it is alleged that it leaked its decision to Jambo news, a publication run by Rwandan exiles Kigali accuses of extremism and genocide negationism.

Mr Karega had been the Rwandan ambassador to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) but was recalled in November 2022, when tension between the two neighbours reached fever high, as Kinshasa accused Rwanda of backing M23 rebels.

Rwanda counter-accused the DRC government of hosting and backing FDLR, a Rwandan rebel group made up of remnants of the genocidal regime.

The blocking of Mr Karega’s accreditation has divided opinion, with analysts accusing Belgium of giving in to pressure from Rwandan exiles and Congolese pressure groups in Europe, who pushed his rejection.

Since relations between Rwanda and DRC soured, Belgium has been keen on strengthening its ties with Kinshasa. Brussels recently initiated European sanctions against certain Rwandan and Congolese military officers and offered European funds to bolster the capabilities of the 31st Rapid Reaction Brigade in the DRC through the European Peace Fund. - MOSES K. GAHIGI, The EastAfrican

Keeping hope alive in the darkest of times is no easy task, but the presence and witness of old, battle-hardened soldiers at significant moments, brings heart to the weary and inspiration to the young.

How heartening it was to see 87-year-old John Khaminwa and 76-year-old CJ Emeritus Willy Mutunga spend long hours in the cold corridors of Central Police Station, Nairobi last weekend demanding the release of 35 young protesters arrested during the Saba Saba commemorations.

That the two veterans of the democratic struggle were tear gassed out of the police station spoke volumes on how the rule of law has degenerated into the law of the jungle in little over a decade since promulgation of the 2010 Constitution. Had the country experienced the political will required to respect and implement the Bill of Rights, the two elders should have been spending Saturday last writing their memoirs or enjoying the company of their grandchildren. 

Instead, for the umpteenth since independence the two veterans had to answer the call of duty to defend the innocent at ungodly hours. The Saba Saba celebrations were organised nationally by civil society actors and social justice centres to commemorate the heroes and heroines of 1990 who defied the treacherous and dictatorial Kanu regime which denied them the right to assemble and protest.

The 2023 protesters met with same resistance, brutality, teargas and violence as their predecessors experienced, indicating nothing has changed in the intervening years and the Kenya Kwanza regime is replicating the misdeeds and crimes of the Kanu era. 

Worse still, on Friday last five people died during protests – two in Migori and three in Kisii – according to the Police Reforms Working Group (PRWG). In the same statement, PRWG detailed how 70 of those arrested in Nairobi were denied medical assistance for over 48 hours. They revealed how police standing orders were disregarded and their code of conduct discarded once again during the Azimio protests on Wednesday past when more protesters were slaughtered.

According to the government established Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR) nine protesters met their maker on Wednesday: four in Mlolongo and one each in Kitengela, Emali, Sondu and Migori.

All the evidence suggests the police were given a carte blanche to use illegal means to quell the protests. Meanwhile, Inspector General of Police Japhet Koome was predictably missing in action, yet evidently sharing orders from above with his foot soldiers on how to deal with the protests. 

The events and evidence of the past week have removed any doubt that may have persisted about the remotest possibility of reforming the police force. The reform programme initiated in 2007 has failed abysmally and become a money guzzler leaving the force more corrupt and brutal than ever. During the period 2013-7, the UNODC contributed 7 million dollars towards the reform programme and overall, it is estimated that Sh81 billion has been swallowed up without making any significant impact.

We live in a police state and deploy a force whose first commitment is to serve the government of the day. A few years ago, the Independent Medico Legal Unit research showed Kenyans are four times more likely to be gunned down by police than by thugs. 

The obvious, if radical, solution, then, is to disband the police force and start afresh. Reform has failed miserably as the force is irredeemable, and resistance to change entrenched at every level of operations.

According to research from the University of Cape Town, Kenyans feel less safe with police around them. Then why hire these armed folk when they are a threat to our own security?

That is not to deny there are some committed and decent cops on the beat. But the problem is the police culture, established by the colonial and repressive state, maintained and entrenched for the past six decades.

This week, Burundian authorities once again displayed their contempt for human rights by walking out of the country’s review before the UN Human Rights Committee in Geneva.

The Burundi delegation walked out shortly after the session began, saying it objected to the presence of members of civil society in attendance – people the government claimed to be “criminals convicted by Burundian justice.” The Committee stood its ground, saying individuals who had been accredited by the UN Human Rights Office could not be excluded from a public meeting. The session proceeded in the absence of the state delegation.

One civil society activist in the room was Armel Niyongere, one of twelve exiled human rights defenders and journalists convicted of participating in a May 2015 coup attempt. The defendants were absent during the sham trial and had no legal representation, a clear breach of due process. Niyongere and many other human rights defenders and journalists fled Burundi after a brutal crackdown against civil society triggered by the country’s 2015 political crisis.

Since the crisis’ outbreak, Burundi has increasingly refused to meaningfully engage with the UN’s human rights mechanisms. In 2016, the Burundian government shocked everyone by refusing to attend to the second day of the UN Committee Against Torture’s special session, organized to review allegations of torture and other abuses in the country. Burundi has also shut down the UN human rights office in the country and refuses to cooperate with the Special Rapporteur on Burundi.

Despite the election of a new president in May 2020, the Burundian government has remained deeply hostile to civil society activists, journalists, and human rights defenders. Today, Floriane Irangabiye, a journalist, is in prison in violation of her right to freedom of expression.

If Burundian authorities are serious about reform they should abandon these convictions, cooperate with international rights experts, and take the committee's recommendations seriously. The European Union and Burundi's other international partners should make clear, through public statements and concrete requests, that their confidence in Burundian authorities will only be restored when they genuinely respect the rights of the media and civil society. Cooperation with international bodies tasked with scrutinizing their human rights record would help in that regard. - Human Rights Watch